Re: [PATCH ALT4 V2 1/2] audit: show fstype:pathname for entries with anonymous parents

> Looking at this again today, why would we want to clear name->dentry > in audit_copy_inode() if it is already set? Does that ever happen? > I'm not sure it does ... It has been nearly 3 months since I coded that, so I'll have to dive in and re-analyse what I was thinking at that time. I think that rationale was that if audit_copy_inode() is called again on that audit_name struct that it could be called by audit_log_link_denied() or __audit_inode() not needing the dentry reference or even by __audit_inode_child() and have it replaced, needing a reference count correction.