On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 12:05:38 -0500
leam hall <leamhall(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Running into errors where we're pushing out a blanket
audit.rules
file and some servers don't have some of the files. I've seen the -i
and -c suggestion for auditctl but wanted to confirm that that's the
right choice. We need to ensure warnings don't choke auditd or make
it skip other rules.
-c will make it continue but ultimately report failure.
-i will make it continue and pretend nothing is wrong.
Either could be correct depending on whether you want success or
failure final status.
-Steve