On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 10:38 -0500, Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
 diff -Nurp linux-2.6.11.5/include/linux/fs.h
linux-2.6.11.5~auditfs/include/linux/fs.h
 --- linux-2.6.11.5/include/linux/fs.h   2005-03-19 00:34:53.000000000 -0600
 +++ linux-2.6.11.5~auditfs/include/linux/fs.h   2005-03-31 11:38:03.000000000 -0600
 @@ -477,6 +477,7 @@ struct inode {
         unsigned int            i_flags;
  
         atomic_t                i_writecount;
 +       struct audit_data       *i_audit;
         void                    *i_security;
         union {
                 void            *generic_ip; 
This bit should probably have been included in the first patch. And I
wonder if we could in fact do without it altogether -- do we really need
to grow the inode structure for this? Relatively few inodes will have
i_audit populated -- could we keep the audit_data in a hash table, and
just use a _flag_ in the inode to indicate that there are audit_data in
the hash table for this inode? 
I believe that there is already an implementation of such a hash table
floating around, because it was once suggested for the i_security field.
Serge, do you have one?
-- 
dwmw2