On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 08:16:11PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
In some cases, we were passing in NULL even when we have a dentry.
Reported-by: Eric Paris <eparis(a)redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton(a)redhat.com>
---
kernel/auditsc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
index 4b96415..5c45b9b 100644
--- a/kernel/auditsc.c
+++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
@@ -2226,7 +2226,7 @@ void __audit_inode_child(const struct dentry *dentry,
if (!strcmp(dname, n->name) ||
!audit_compare_dname_path(dname, n->name, &dirlen)) {
if (inode)
- audit_copy_inode(n, NULL, inode);
+ audit_copy_inode(n, dentry, inode);
Btw, the calling conventions here also seems fairly ugly.
Instead of the optional dentry parameter I'd have a audit_copy_inode
that takes just the name and the inode, and an optional direct call
to audit_copy_fcaps for those callers that have a dentry. That would
also allow removing the branch for the dentry == NULL case in
audit_copy_fcaps.