Re: Rational behind RefuseManualStop=yes in auditd.service
On 12/18/2013 01:07 PM, Tony Jones wrote:
On 12/18/2013 12:38 PM, Eric Paris wrote:
> He made the change in the upstream repo, because that's what you need
> for certification purposes. Personally, I hate it, cause i don't give a
> hoot about that and would rather things to be consistent, but that's the
> rational. A certifiable audit needs what he has in the repo. If we
> ever get all of the credential data available to systemd it can be
> reverted...
This doesn't really make a lot of sense as a certifiable audit presumably also needs
the local Fedora specific changes to systemd, which are not in the upstream systemd repo.
So I'd have thought the Fedora specific audit package was a perfectly suitable
location for the audit changes rather than the main audit svn repo.
OIC, you were talking purely of the addition of the RefuseManualStop=yes, Sorry, I was
talking more about the presence of utility scripts in the svn repo that are Fedora
specific since they rely on Fedora systemd extensions.
Anyhow, as I said, not a big deal. Thanks for reply.