On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 12:30 PM Dmitry V. Levin <ldv(a)altlinux.org> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:24:02PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 12:14:37PM -0800, Max Filippov wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 4:53 AM Dmitry V. Levin <ldv(a)altlinux.org>
wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 09:02:50PM -0800, Max Filippov wrote:
> > > > How should we synchronize our changes?
> > >
> > > No problem, I can revert to the previous edition of this patch
> > > that just adds syscall_get_arch.
> > > Alternatively, you can just take that couple of patches (v5 18/25
> > > and v2 15/15) into your tree.
> >
> > Sure I can do the second. Will it work for v2 16/15 that changes
> > syscall_get_arch adding an argument to it?
>
> No, I'm afraid it won't work for v2 16/15 (aka v5 22/25), which means
> I'd have to keep them in the series.
You can surely take them into your tree, but I'll have to keep them
in the series because of that change of syscall_get_arch signature.
Sorry for confusion.
Ok, no problem, I'll take them. I'm planning to merge this branch into the
for-next in a couple of days, let's see how it goes after that.
--
Thanks.
-- Max