Currently the IPsec protocol SPI values are written to the audit log in
network byte order which is different from almost all other values which
are recorded in host byte order. This patch corrects this inconsistency
by writing the SPI values to the audit record in host byte order.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore(a)hp.com>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 10 ++++++----
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
index cf43c49..1af522b 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
@@ -2028,6 +2028,7 @@ void
xfrm_audit_state_add(struct xfrm_state *x, int result, u32 auid, u32 sid)
{
struct audit_buffer *audit_buf;
+ u32 spi;
extern int audit_enabled;
if (audit_enabled == 0)
@@ -2037,8 +2038,8 @@ xfrm_audit_state_add(struct xfrm_state *x, int result, u32 auid, u32
sid)
return;
audit_log_format(audit_buf, " op=SAD-add res=%u",result);
xfrm_audit_common_stateinfo(x, audit_buf);
- audit_log_format(audit_buf, " spi=%lu(0x%lx)",
- (unsigned long)x->id.spi, (unsigned long)x->id.spi);
+ spi = ntohl(x->id.spi);
+ audit_log_format(audit_buf, " spi=%u(0x%x)", spi, spi);
audit_log_end(audit_buf);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xfrm_audit_state_add);
@@ -2047,6 +2048,7 @@ void
xfrm_audit_state_delete(struct xfrm_state *x, int result, u32 auid, u32 sid)
{
struct audit_buffer *audit_buf;
+ u32 spi;
extern int audit_enabled;
if (audit_enabled == 0)
@@ -2056,8 +2058,8 @@ xfrm_audit_state_delete(struct xfrm_state *x, int result, u32 auid,
u32 sid)
return;
audit_log_format(audit_buf, " op=SAD-delete res=%u",result);
xfrm_audit_common_stateinfo(x, audit_buf);
- audit_log_format(audit_buf, " spi=%lu(0x%lx)",
- (unsigned long)x->id.spi, (unsigned long)x->id.spi);
+ spi = ntohl(x->id.spi);
+ audit_log_format(audit_buf, " spi=%u(0x%x)", spi, spi);
audit_log_end(audit_buf);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xfrm_audit_state_delete);
Show replies by date
From: Paul Moore <paul.moore(a)hp.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:05:42 -0500
Currently the IPsec protocol SPI values are written to the audit log
in
network byte order which is different from almost all other values which
are recorded in host byte order. This patch corrects this inconsistency
by writing the SPI values to the audit record in host byte order.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore(a)hp.com>
Applied to net-2.6, thanks Paul.
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 14:05:42 Paul Moore wrote:
This patch corrects this inconsistency by writing the SPI values to
the
audit record in host byte order.
Looks OK, to me, too.
-Steve