As far as I can tell the numbers seem to be OK. I haven't been able to
do a thorough check all but the system calls I have tested appear to
match (socketcall, open, close, read, write). I think a thorough
testing should be done. I haven't had time to perform any testing
quite to this level.
Cheers,
Nathaniel
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Steve Grubb <sgrubb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Friday, June 15, 2012 01:23:13 PM Nathaniel Husted wrote:
> The current stable version of ARM will not run in QEMU and errors with
> an "unknown machine type" error. The following patch adds two machine
> times to the ARMEB machine architecture. "armv5tejl" is the type
> returned by uname -m when running the versatilepb machine type with a
> default CPU (under Debian Squeeze 6.0). "armv7l" is return by uname -m
> when run on a Samgsung Galaxy S SGH-I897 phone.
Are the syscall numbers OK? IOW, with this change auditing works correctly on
those systems?
-Steve
> Signed-off by: Nathaniel Husted <nhusted(a)gmail.com>
>
> diff -rpuN audit-2.2.1/lib/machinetab.h audit-2.2.1-patched/lib/machinetab.h
> --- audit-2.2.1/lib/machinetab.h 2012-03-23 08:42:44.000000000 -0400 +++
> audit-2.2.1-patched/lib/machinetab.h 2012-06-15 16:18:33.069787303 -0400 @@
> -35,4 +35,6 @@ _S(MACH_ALPHA, "alpha" )
> #endif
> #ifdef WITH_ARMEB
> _S(MACH_ARMEB, "armeb" )
> +_S(MACH_ARMEB, "armv5tejl")
> +_S(MACH_ARMEB, "armv7l")
> #endif
>
> --
> Linux-audit mailing list
> Linux-audit(a)redhat.com
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit