On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 13:30 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 01:16:17PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:04:15PM +0000, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > > > While trying to compile the kernel for ARM (omap2plus_defconfig) the kernel > > > build fails with: > > > > > > arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c: In function ‘syscall_trace’: > > > arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c:920:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘audit_syscall_exit’ > > > arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c:922:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘audit_syscall_entry’ > > > arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c:922:23: error: ‘AUDIT_ARCH_ARMEB’ undeclared (first use in this function) > > > arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c:922:23: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > > > make[1]: *** [arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.o] Error 1 > > > > > > The issue created by commit: > > > 29ef73b7 Kernel: Audit Support For The ARM Platform > > > > > > We need to include the linux/audit.h header to the arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c > > > file to be able to compile the kernel. > > > > This was already reported and I think Russell was going to revert the > > offending commit, since it needed some rework to handle little-endian > > configurations. > > > > I can't see the revert in any of the trees I'm tracking though... > > I never pushed that out because I thought someone was going to fix it. > Were any patches produced to fix it? I can't see anything in the patch > system and I couldn't see anything on the list. > > It seems the previous thread about it just died. Oh well, I guess a > revert is what's required after all. http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=132928424120369&w=2 ???