process_buffer_measurement() and ima_alloc_key_entry() functions need to log an audit message for auditing integrity measurement failures. Add audit message in these two functions. Remove "pr_devel" log message in process_buffer_measurement(). Sample audit messages: [ 6.415374] audit: type=1804 audit(1592005945.627:2): pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=kernel op=measuring_kexec_cmdline cause=alloc_entry comm="swapper/0" name="kexec-cmdline" res=0 result=-12 [ 8.085456] audit: type=1802 audit(1592005947.297:9): pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 op=policy_update cause=completed comm="systemd" res=1 result=0 [ 8.128004] audit: type=1804 audit(1592005947.341:11): pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 op=measuring_key cause=hashing_error comm="systemd" name=".builtin_trusted_keys" res=0 result=-22 Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas(a)linux.microsoft.com&gt; Suggested-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar(a)linux.ibm.com&gt; --- security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 48 ++++++++++++++++--------- security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 18 +++++++--- security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 2 +- security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c | 5 +++ 4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h index df93ac258e01..c3a32e181b48 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h @@ -186,27 +186,43 @@ static inline unsigned int ima_hash_key(u8 *digest) return (digest[0] | digest[1] << 8) % IMA_MEASURE_HTABLE_SIZE; } -#define __ima_hooks(hook) \ - hook(NONE) \ - hook(FILE_CHECK) \ - hook(MMAP_CHECK) \ - hook(BPRM_CHECK) \ - hook(CREDS_CHECK) \ - hook(POST_SETATTR) \ - hook(MODULE_CHECK) \ - hook(FIRMWARE_CHECK) \ - hook(KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK) \ - hook(KEXEC_INITRAMFS_CHECK) \ - hook(POLICY_CHECK) \ - hook(KEXEC_CMDLINE) \ - hook(KEY_CHECK) \ - hook(MAX_CHECK) -#define __ima_hook_enumify(ENUM) ENUM, +#define __ima_hooks(hook) \ + hook(NONE, none) \ + hook(FILE_CHECK, file) \ + hook(MMAP_CHECK, mmap) \ + hook(BPRM_CHECK, bprm) \ + hook(CREDS_CHECK, creds) \ + hook(POST_SETATTR, post_setattr) \ + hook(MODULE_CHECK, module) \ + hook(FIRMWARE_CHECK, firmware) \ + hook(KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK, kexec_kernel) \ + hook(KEXEC_INITRAMFS_CHECK, kexec_initramfs) \ + hook(POLICY_CHECK, policy) \ + hook(KEXEC_CMDLINE, kexec_cmdline) \ + hook(KEY_CHECK, key) \ + hook(MAX_CHECK, none) + +#define __ima_hook_enumify(ENUM, str) ENUM, +#define __ima_stringify(arg) (#arg) +#define __ima_hook_measuring_stringify(ENUM, str) \ + (__ima_stringify(measuring_ ##str)), enum ima_hooks { __ima_hooks(__ima_hook_enumify) }; +static const char * const ima_hooks_measure_str[] = { + __ima_hooks(__ima_hook_measuring_stringify) +}; + +static inline const char *func_measure_str(enum ima_hooks func) +{ + if (func >= MAX_CHECK) + return ima_hooks_measure_str[NONE]; + + return ima_hooks_measure_str[func]; +} + extern const char *const func_tokens[]; struct modsig; diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c index c1583d98c5e5..8a001aa8e592 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c @@ -740,6 +740,7 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(const void *buf, int size, int pcr, const char *keyring) { int ret = 0; + const char *audit_cause = "ENOMEM"; struct ima_template_entry *entry = NULL; struct integrity_iint_cache iint = {}; struct ima_event_data event_data = {.iint = &iint, @@ -794,21 +795,28 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(const void *buf, int size, iint.ima_hash->length = hash_digest_size[ima_hash_algo]; ret = ima_calc_buffer_hash(buf, size, iint.ima_hash); - if (ret < 0) + if (ret < 0) { + audit_cause = "hashing_error"; goto out; + } ret = ima_alloc_init_template(&event_data, &entry, template); - if (ret < 0) + if (ret < 0) { + audit_cause = "alloc_entry"; goto out; + } ret = ima_store_template(entry, violation, NULL, buf, pcr); - - if (ret < 0) + if (ret < 0) { + audit_cause = "store_entry"; ima_free_template_entry(entry); + } out: if (ret < 0) - pr_devel("%s: failed, result: %d\n", __func__, ret); + integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_PCR, NULL, eventname, + func_measure_str(func), + audit_cause, ret, 0); return; } diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index e493063a3c34..66aa3e17a888 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -1414,7 +1414,7 @@ void ima_delete_rules(void) } } -#define __ima_hook_stringify(str) (#str), +#define __ima_hook_stringify(func, str) (#func), const char *const func_tokens[] = { __ima_hooks(__ima_hook_stringify) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c index cb3e3f501593..631fd7ab2dcd 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_queue_keys.c @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ static struct ima_key_entry *ima_alloc_key_entry(struct key *keyring, size_t payload_len) { int rc = 0; + const char *audit_cause = "ENOMEM"; struct ima_key_entry *entry; entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL); @@ -88,6 +89,10 @@ static struct ima_key_entry *ima_alloc_key_entry(struct key *keyring, out: if (rc) { + integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_PCR, NULL, + keyring->description, + func_measure_str(KEY_CHECK), + audit_cause, rc, 0); ima_free_key_entry(entry); entry = NULL; } -- 2.27.0

On Monday, June 15, 2020 6:51:22 PM EDT Paul Moore wrote: Paul, But we can't do this. The field name dictionary says this is used to convey success/fail. It is hard coded in the field interpretation table to look for 0/1 and interpret that. Interpeting this field will now produce an error message. And "result" is a searchable field. As I suggested a few emails back, let's just use errno or something not already taken in the dictionary. NACK. -Steve