Re: Getting the program name in audit messages

On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 14:24 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote: > It just means that we keep the diff for auditsc.c as is, and drop the > diff for avc.c, i.e. we add comm and exe logging to the syscall auditing > but leave exe logging unmodified in the avc. Which I think is what > David Woodhouse did already for his kernel since he wasn't sure about > the avc change. It is. Since it's now purely an audit patch, should I put it into the BK tree?