Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] seccomp: Selftest for detection of filter flag support

Userspace needs to be able to reliably detect the support of a filter flag. A good way of doing that is by attempting to enter filter mode, with the flag bit(s) in question set, and a NULL pointer for the args parameter of seccomp(2). EFAULT indicates that the flag is valid and EINVAL indicates that the flag is invalid. This patch adds a selftest that can be used to test this method of detection in userspace. Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks(a)canonical.com&gt; --- * Changes since v4: - This is a new patch tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c index 040e875..d221437 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c @@ -1885,6 +1885,64 @@ TEST(seccomp_syscall_mode_lock) } } +/* Test detection of known and unknown filter flags. Userspace needs to be able + * to check if a filter flag is support by the current kernel and a good way of + * doing that is by attempting to enter filter mode, with the flag bit in + * question set, and a NULL pointer for the _args_ parameter. EFAULT indicates + * that the flag is valid and EINVAL indicates that the flag is invalid. + */ +TEST(detect_seccomp_filter_flags) +{ + unsigned int flags[] = { SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC, + SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_LOG }; + unsigned int flag, all_flags; + int i; + long ret; + + /* Test detection of known-good filter flags */ + for (i = 0, all_flags = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(flags); i++) { + flag = flags[i]; + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, flag, NULL); + ASSERT_NE(ENOSYS, errno) { + TH_LOG("Kernel does not support seccomp syscall!"); + } + EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); + EXPECT_EQ(EFAULT, errno) { + TH_LOG("Failed to detect that a known-good filter flag (0x%X) is supported!", + flag); + } + + all_flags |= flag; + } + + /* Test detection of all known-good filter flags */ + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, all_flags, NULL); + EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); + EXPECT_EQ(EFAULT, errno) { + TH_LOG("Failed to detect that all known-good filter flags (0x%X) are supported!", + all_flags); + } + + /* Test detection of an unknown filter flag */ + flag = -1; + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, flag, NULL); + EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); + EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno) { + TH_LOG("Failed to detect that an unknown filter flag (0x%X) is unsupported!", + flag); + } + + /* Test detection of an unknown filter flag that may simply need to be + * added to this test */ + flag = flags[ARRAY_SIZE(flags) - 1] << 1; + ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, flag, NULL); + EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret); + EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno) { + TH_LOG("Failed to detect that an unknown filter flag (0x%X) is unsupported! Does a new flag need to be added to this test?", + flag); + } +} + TEST(TSYNC_first) { struct sock_filter filter[] = { -- 2.7.4