On 14/02/03, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
 Richard, 
Takahiro,
 On 01/30/2014 07:36 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
 >On 14/01/29, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
 >>On 14/01/27, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
 >>>[To audit maintainers]
 >>>
 >>>On 01/23/2014 11:18 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
 >>>>On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:13:14AM +0000, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
 >>>>>--- a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
 >>>>>+++ b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
 >>>>>@@ -327,6 +327,8 @@ enum {
 >>>>>  /* distinguish syscall tables */
 >>>>>  #define __AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT 0x80000000
 >>>>>  #define __AUDIT_ARCH_LE	   0x40000000
 >>>>>+#define
AUDIT_ARCH_AARCH64	(EM_AARCH64|__AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT|__AUDIT_ARCH_LE)
 >>>>>+#define AUDIT_ARCH_AARCH64EB	(EM_AARCH64|__AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT)
 >>>>>  #define
AUDIT_ARCH_ALPHA	(EM_ALPHA|__AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT|__AUDIT_ARCH_LE)
 >>>>>  #define AUDIT_ARCH_ARM		(EM_ARM|__AUDIT_ARCH_LE)
 >>>>>  #define AUDIT_ARCH_ARMEB	(EM_ARM)
 >>>>>diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
 >>>>>index 79383d3..3aae602 100644
 >>>>>--- a/init/Kconfig
 >>>>>+++ b/init/Kconfig
 >>>>>@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ config AUDIT
 >>>>>
 >>>>>  config AUDITSYSCALL
 >>>>>  	bool "Enable system-call auditing support"
 >>>>>-	depends on AUDIT && (X86 || PARISC || PPC || S390 || IA64
|| UML || SPARC64 || SUPERH || (ARM && AEABI && !OABI_COMPAT))
 >>>>>+	depends on AUDIT && (X86 || PARISC || PPC || S390 || IA64
|| UML || SPARC64 || SUPERH || (ARM && AEABI && !OABI_COMPAT) || ARM64)
 >>>>
 >>>>The usual comment for such changes: could you please clean this up and
 >>>>just use something like "depends on HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL"?
 >>>
 >>>Do you agree to this change?
 >>>
 >>>If so, I can create a patch, but have some concerns:
 >>>1) I can't verify it on other architectures than (arm &) arm64.
 >>>2) Some architectures (microblaze, mips, openrisc) are not listed here, but
 >>>    their ptrace.c have a call to audit_syscall_entry/exit().
 >>>    (audit_syscall_entry/exit are null if !AUDITSYSCALL, though)
 >>
 >>I can try: ppc s390 x86_64 ppc64 i686 s390x
 >
 >These arches above all pass compile and basic tests with the following patches
applied:
 >
 >	audit: correct a type mismatch in audit_syscall_exit() pending (already upstream)
 >
 >	audit: Modify a set of system calls in audit class definitions (already upstream)
 >
 >	[PATCH v3] audit: Add generic compat syscall support
 >
 >	[PATCH v2] audit: Enable arm64 support
 >	[PATCH v2] arm64: Add regs_return_value() in syscall.h
 >	[PATCH v2] arm64: Add audit support
 >	[PATCH v2] arm64: audit: Add 32-bit (compat) syscall support
 >	[PATCH v2] arm64: audit: Add makefile rule to create unistd_32.h for compat
syscalls
 >	[PATCH v2] arm64: audit: Add audit hook in ptrace/syscall_trace
 
 I think that you missed Catalin's suggestion. 
I didn't miss his suggestions.  I think they are a good way to go, but I
wanted to make a test at referrable point in time to validate the work
to that point and to avoid introducing errors by mis-interpreting ideas
that were not yet fully-formed patches.
 Please use the patch I will post after this message and try it again,
please? 
I was certainly intending to do so.
 Thanks,
 -Takahiro AKASHI
 
 >>>So I'm afraid that the change might break someone's assumption.
 >>>
 >>>Thanks,
 >>>-Takahiro AKASHI
 >>
 >>- RGB
 >
 >- RGB
 >
 >--
 >Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs(a)redhat.com>
 >Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
 >Remote, Ottawa, Canada
 >Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545
 > 
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs(a)redhat.com>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545