On Friday 21 December 2007 8:27:23 am Paul Moore wrote:
On Friday 21 December 2007 4:43:10 am David Miller wrote:
> From: Paul Moore <paul.moore(a)hp.com>
> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:42:25 -0500
>
> > This patch adds a number of new IPsec audit events to meet the auditing
> > requirements of RFC4303. This includes audit hooks for the following
> > events:
> >
> > * Could not find a valid SA [sections 2.1, 3.4.2]
> > . xfrm_audit_state_notfound()
> > . xfrm_audit_state_notfound_simple()
> >
> > * Sequence number overflow [section 3.3.3]
> > . xfrm_audit_state_replay_overflow()
> >
> > * Replayed packet [section 3.4.3]
> > . xfrm_audit_state_replay()
> >
> > * Integrity check failure [sections 3.4.4.1, 3.4.4.2]
> > . xfrm_audit_state_icvfail()
> >
> > While RFC4304 deals only with ESP most of the changes in this patch
> > apply to IPsec in general, i.e. both AH and ESP. The one case,
> > integrity check failure, where ESP specific code had to be modified the
> > same was done to the AH code for the sake of consistency.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore(a)hp.com>
>
> This doesn't apply at all to net-2.6.25, in particular
> xfrm6_input_addr() doesn't even have a local variable
> named "xfrm_vec_one" let alone the conditional where you're
> adding the state notfound audit hook.
>
> Please respin this and the third patch, thanks.
Sorry about that, I must have missed something (or probably just updated
the wrong tree on accident). I'll respin the patches and send them out
today.
Ah, looks like I may not be crazy after all! It looks like the XFRM patches
from Masahide NAKAMURA were pulled into net-2.6.25 just before mine last
night which caused my patches to conflict ...
--
paul moore
linux security @ hp