On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 11:41 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Implement audit container identifier filtering using the AUDIT_CONTID
field name to send an 8-character string representing a u64 since the
value field is only u32.
Sending it as two u32 was considered, but gathering and comparing two
fields was more complex.
The feature indicator is AUDIT_FEATURE_BITMAP_CONTAINERID.
Please see the github audit kernel issue for the contid filter feature:
https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/91
Please see the github audit userspace issue for filter additions:
https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-userspace/issues/40
Please see the github audit testsuiite issue for the test case:
https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-testsuite/issues/64
Please see the github audit wiki for the feature overview:
https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/wiki/RFE-Audit-Container-ID
Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com>
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge(a)hallyn.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman(a)tuxdriver.com>
Reviewed-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace(a)redhat.com>
---
include/linux/audit.h | 1 +
include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 5 ++++-
kernel/audit.h | 1 +
kernel/auditfilter.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/auditsc.c | 4 ++++
5 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
...
diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
index 63f8b3f26fab..407b5bb3b4c6 100644
--- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
+++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
@@ -1206,6 +1224,31 @@ int audit_comparator(u32 left, u32 op, u32 right)
}
}
+int audit_comparator64(u64 left, u32 op, u64 right)
+{
+ switch (op) {
+ case Audit_equal:
+ return (left == right);
+ case Audit_not_equal:
+ return (left != right);
+ case Audit_lt:
+ return (left < right);
+ case Audit_le:
+ return (left <= right);
+ case Audit_gt:
+ return (left > right);
+ case Audit_ge:
+ return (left >= right);
+ case Audit_bitmask:
+ return (left & right);
+ case Audit_bittest:
+ return ((left & right) == right);
+ default:
+ BUG();
A little birdy mentioned the BUG() here as a potential issue and while
I had ignored it in earlier patches because this is likely a
cut-n-paste from another audit comparator function, I took a closer
look this time. It appears as though we will never have an invalid op
value as audit_data_to_entry()/audit_to_op() ensure that the op value
is a a known good value. Removing the BUG() from all the audit
comparators is a separate issue, but I think it would be good to
remove it from this newly added comparator; keeping it so that we
return "0" in the default case seems reasoanble.
+ return 0;
+ }
+}
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com