Re: audit tree for inclusion in -mm
* Steve Grubb (sgrubb(a)redhat.com) wrote:
On Friday 29 April 2005 13:22, Chris Wright wrote:
> Good, I had same conclusion (esp. for the straight bug fixes).
What did we decide about the printk issue? Are we going to improve the current
patch to clamp at byte 1023 so we don't leak memory?
That's one of the bits I'm looking at in David's tree.
thanks,
-chris
--
Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net