Re: [PATCH 00/34] fs: idmapped mounts
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner(a)ubuntu.com> writes:
Hey everyone,
I vanished for a little while to focus on this work here so sorry for
not being available by mail for a while.
Since quite a long time we have issues with sharing mounts between
multiple unprivileged containers with different id mappings, sharing a
rootfs between multiple containers with different id mappings, and also
sharing regular directories and filesystems between users with different
uids and gids. The latter use-cases have become even more important with
the availability and adoption of systemd-homed (cf. [1]) to implement
portable home directories.
Can you walk us through the motivating use case?
As of this year's LPC I had the distinct impression that the primary use
case for such a feature was due to the RLIMIT_NPROC problem where two
containers with the same users still wanted different uid mappings to
the disk because the users were conflicting with each other because of
the per user rlimits.
Fixing rlimits is straight forward to implement, and easier to manage
for implementations and administrators.
Reading up on systemd-homed it appears to be a way to have encrypted
home directories. Those home directories can either be encrypted at the
fs or at the block level. Those home directories appear to have the
goal of being luggable between systems. If the systems in question
don't have common administration of uids and gids after lugging your
encrypted home directory to another system chowning the files is
required.
Is that the use case you are looking at removing the need for
systemd-homed to avoid chowning after lugging encrypted home directories
from one system to another? Why would it be desirable to avoid the
chown?
If the goal is to solve fragmented administration of uid assignment I
suggest that it might be better to solve the administration problem so
that all of the uids of interest get assigned the same way on all of the
systems of interest. To the extent it is possible to solve the uid
assignment problem that would seem to have fewer long term
administrative problems.
Eric