On 08/02/2012 05:12 PM, Miloslav Trmac wrote:
I'm not 100% sure what you mean, but is perhaps
auparse_interpret_field what you are looking for? It returns an
"intepreted" (as opposed to "raw") version of the field, e.g. a name
instead of an UID.
Yes, that's the correct function to call. However it should be done by a
plugin which iterates over all the items and adds an interpreted result
to the raw result. For long term detached audit purposes you need both
the raw and interpreted value. The plugin then emits the augmented data
containing both the raw and interpreted values.
--
John Dennis <jdennis(a)redhat.com>
Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/