On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 10:11 +0800, zhangxiliang wrote:
When the "status_get->mask" is
"AUDIT_STATUS_RATE_LIMIT || AUDIT_STATUS_BACKLOG_LIMIT".
If "audit_set_rate_limit" fails and "audit_set_backlog_limit"
succeeds, the "err" value will be greater than or equal to 0. It will miss the
failure of rate set.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiliang <zhangxiliang(a)cn.fujitsu.com>
man, it gives me the heebee jeebies with the coding style but it follows
everything else
Acked-by: Eric Paris <eparis(a)redhat.com>
---
kernel/audit.c | 4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
index e092f1c..38a4080 100644
--- a/kernel/audit.c
+++ b/kernel/audit.c
@@ -725,9 +725,11 @@ static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr
*nlh)
audit_pid = new_pid;
audit_nlk_pid = NETLINK_CB(skb).pid;
}
- if (status_get->mask & AUDIT_STATUS_RATE_LIMIT)
+ if (status_get->mask & AUDIT_STATUS_RATE_LIMIT) {
err = audit_set_rate_limit(status_get->rate_limit,
loginuid, sessionid, sid);
+ if (err < 0) return err;
+ }
if (status_get->mask & AUDIT_STATUS_BACKLOG_LIMIT)
err = audit_set_backlog_limit(status_get->backlog_limit,
loginuid, sessionid, sid);
--
1.5.4.2