Re: [RFC][PATCH] collect security labels on user processes generating audit messages
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 09:49 -0600, Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
This makes sense to me. I'll go ahead and make the change. I
wouldn't
even technically need the function or function call in my patch since
selinux_available() simply returns ss_initialized.
Well, I think we want to keep that variable private to the SELinux
"module". In the future, we'll likely add proper namespace prefixes to
all non-static SELinux symbols to avoid polluting the kernel namespace.
--
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency