On Tuesday 05 April 2005 05:30 pm, David Woodhouse wrote:
 On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 10:38 -0500, Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
 > diff -Nurp linux-2.6.11.5/include/linux/fs.h
 > linux-2.6.11.5~auditfs/include/linux/fs.h ---
 > linux-2.6.11.5/include/linux/fs.h   2005-03-19 00:34:53.000000000 -0600
 > +++ linux-2.6.11.5~auditfs/include/linux/fs.h   2005-03-31
 > 11:38:03.000000000 -0600 @@ -477,6 +477,7 @@ struct inode {
 >         unsigned int            i_flags;
 >
 >         atomic_t                i_writecount;
 > +       struct audit_data       *i_audit;
 >         void                    *i_security;
 >         union {
 >                 void            *generic_ip; 
Aye, you're right.
 This bit should probably have been included in the first patch. And I
 wonder if we could in fact do without it altogether -- do we really need
 to grow the inode structure for this? Relatively few inodes will have
 i_audit populated -- could we keep the audit_data in a hash table, and
 just use a _flag_ in the inode to indicate that there are audit_data in
 the hash table for this inode? 
Haha.  Your timing is impeccable :)
-tim
 I believe that there is already an implementation of such a hash table
 floating around, because it was once suggested for the i_security field.
 Serge, do you have one?