Re: [RFC][PATCH] collect security labels on user processes generating audit messages
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 10:35 -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Thursday 16 February 2006 10:29, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> Except for what other code should do about NULL pointers in output. If
> they defer it to vsnprintf, they will end up with <NULL> in the output.
> So should Tim's code be checking for !ctx and outputting (null) there as
> well?
Yes, I think that would be consistent will all the other audit code.
-Steve
Yes. I've already made this change. I just saw that Darren's recent
patch submission included the API work I just did (that he suggested
yesterday)... in the process of testing now.
Thanks.
-tim