Re: [PATCH 0/6] audit: Fix various races when tagging and untagging mounts

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 7:44 AM Amir Goldstein <amir73il(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 7:40 PM, Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz&gt; wrote: > > Hello, > > > > this series addresses the problems I have identified when trying to understand > > how exactly is kernel/audit_tree.c using generic fsnotify framework. I hope > > I have understood all the interactions right but careful review is certainly > > welcome (CCing Al as he was the one implementing this code originally). > > > > The patches have been tested by a stress test I have written which mounts & > > unmounts filesystems in the directory tree while adding and removing audit > > rules for this tree in parallel and accessing the tree to generate events. > > Still some real-world testing would be welcome. > > > > This sort of stress test sound really useful to fanotify/inotify as well. > Do plan to upstream that stress test? Agreed. I would be interested in having something like this in the audit-testsuite so that we can include it in our regular regression testing. * https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-testsuite