On 5/22/2021 7:00 PM, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Friday, May 21, 2021 6:05:41 PM EDT Casey Schaufler wrote:
>>> The record is produced only in cases where there is more than one
>>> security module with a process "context".
>>> In cases where this record is produced the subj= fields of
>>> other records in the audit event will be set to "subj=?".
>>>
>>> An example of the MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS (1420) record is:
>>>
>>> type=UNKNOWN[1420]
>>> msg=audit(1600880931.832:113)
>>> subj_apparmor==unconfined
>> It should be just a single "=" in the line above.
> AppArmor provides the 2nd "=" as part of the subject context.
> What's here is correct. I won't argue that it won't case confusion
> or worse.
We have a specification for a very long time:
https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-documentation/wiki/SPEC-Writing-Good...
Everyone has to obey rules or no tools work.
Right. Would quoting the value subj_apparmor="=unconfined" suffice?
I think that's what the rulebook says, but I like to be sure.