Re: AUDIT_NETFILTER_PKT message format
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 2017-01-17 08:55, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 17, 2017 12:25:51 AM EST Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
...
> > Ones that are not so straightforward:
> > - "secmark" depends on a kernel config setting, so should it always
be
> > present but "(none)" if that kernel feature is compiled out?
>
> If this is selinux related, I'd treat it the same way that we do subj
> everywhere else.
Ok.
To be clear, a packet's secmark should be recorded via a dedicated
field, e.g. "secmark", and not use the "subj" field (it isn't a
subject label in the traditional sense).
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com