On 2018-03-04 10:01, Paul Moore wrote:
 On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 4:19 AM, Serge E. Hallyn
<serge(a)hallyn.com> wrote:
 > On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:41:04PM -0500, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
 > ...
 >> +static inline bool audit_containerid_set(struct task_struct *tsk)
 >
 > Hi Richard,
 >
 > the calls to audit_containerid_set() confused me.  Could you make it
 > is_audit_containerid_set() or audit_containerid_isset()?
 
 I haven't gone through the entire patchset yet, but I wanted to
 quickly comment on this ... I really dislike the
 function-names-as-sentences approach and would would greatly prefer
 audit_containerid_isset(). 
I'd be ok with this latter if necessary, but the naming mimics the
existing loginuid naming convention.
 >> +{
 >> +     return audit_get_containerid(tsk) != INVALID_CID;
 >> +}
 
 paul moore 
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com>
Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635