On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 4:11 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Implement the proc fs write to set the audit container identifier of a
process, emitting an AUDIT_CONTAINER_OP record to document the event.
This is a write from the container orchestrator task to a proc entry of
the form /proc/PID/audit_containerid where PID is the process ID of the
newly created task that is to become the first task in a container, or
an additional task added to a container.
The write expects up to a u64 value (unset: 18446744073709551615).
The writer must have capability CAP_AUDIT_CONTROL.
This will produce a record such as this:
type=CONTAINER_ID msg=audit(2018-06-06 12:39:29.636:26949) : op=set opid=2209
old-contid=18446744073709551615 contid=123456 pid=628 auid=root uid=root tty=ttyS0 ses=1
subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 comm=bash exe=/usr/bin/bash
res=yes
You need to update the record type in the example above.
The "op" field indicates an initial set. The
"pid" to "ses" fields are
the orchestrator while the "opid" field is the object's PID, the process
being "contained". Old and new audit container identifier values are
given in the "contid" fields, while res indicates its success.
I understand Steve's concern around the "op" field, but I think it
might be a bit premature to think we might not need to do some sort of
audit container ID management in the future that would want to make
use of the CONTAINER_OP message type. I would like to see the "op"
field preserved.
It is not permitted to unset the audit container identifier.
A child inherits its parent's audit container identifier.
See:
https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/90
See:
https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-userspace/issues/51
See:
https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-testsuite/issues/64
See:
https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/wiki/RFE-Audit-Container-ID
Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com>
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge(a)hallyn.com>
Acked-by: Steve Grubb <sgrubb(a)redhat.com>
---
fs/proc/base.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/audit.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++
include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 2 ++
kernel/auditsc.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 131 insertions(+)
...
@@ -2112,6 +2114,72 @@ int audit_set_loginuid(kuid_t loginuid)
}
/**
+ * audit_set_contid - set current task's audit_context contid
+ * @contid: contid value
+ *
+ * Returns 0 on success, -EPERM on permission failure.
+ *
+ * Called (set) from fs/proc/base.c::proc_contid_write().
+ */
+int audit_set_contid(struct task_struct *task, u64 contid)
+{
+ u64 oldcontid;
+ int rc = 0;
+ struct audit_buffer *ab;
+ uid_t uid;
+ struct tty_struct *tty;
+ char comm[sizeof(current->comm)];
+
+ task_lock(task);
+ /* Can't set if audit disabled */
+ if (!task->audit) {
+ task_unlock(task);
+ return -ENOPROTOOPT;
+ }
+ oldcontid = audit_get_contid(task);
+ read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
I assume lockdep was happy with nesting the tasklist_lock inside the task lock?
+ /* Don't allow the audit containerid to be unset */
+ if (!audit_contid_valid(contid))
+ rc = -EINVAL;
+ /* if we don't have caps, reject */
+ else if (!capable(CAP_AUDIT_CONTROL))
+ rc = -EPERM;
+ /* if task has children or is not single-threaded, deny */
+ else if (!list_empty(&task->children))
+ rc = -EBUSY;
+ else if (!(thread_group_leader(task) && thread_group_empty(task)))
+ rc = -EALREADY;
+ read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+ if (!rc)
+ task->audit->contid = contid;
+ task_unlock(task);
+
+ if (!audit_enabled)
+ return rc;
+
+ ab = audit_log_start(audit_context(), GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONTAINER_OP);
+ if (!ab)
+ return rc;
+
+ uid = from_kuid(&init_user_ns, task_uid(current));
+ tty = audit_get_tty(current);
+ audit_log_format(ab, "op=set opid=%d old-contid=%llu contid=%llu pid=%d
uid=%u auid=%u tty=%s ses=%u",
+ task_tgid_nr(task), oldcontid, contid,
+ task_tgid_nr(current), uid,
+ from_kuid(&init_user_ns, audit_get_loginuid(current)),
+ tty ? tty_name(tty) : "(none)",
+ audit_get_sessionid(current));
+ audit_put_tty(tty);
+ audit_log_task_context(ab);
+ audit_log_format(ab, " comm=");
+ audit_log_untrustedstring(ab, get_task_comm(comm, current));
+ audit_log_d_path_exe(ab, current->mm);
+ audit_log_format(ab, " res=%d", !rc);
+ audit_log_end(ab);
+ return rc;
+}
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com