Re: Watch Performance
Klaus Weidner wrote: [Mon Apr 17 2006, 04:06:56PM EDT]
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 10:27:34AM -0500, Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
> Maybe this is a completely stupid thought, but what about the option of
> adding a per-syscall filter list table, indexed by system-call number.
That's how LAuS worked... You'd need to support multiple lists to handle
multiple personalities (ie 32bit code running on x86_64).
The amount of space used isn't too bad; it would also be possible to use
reference counting to share entries for identical rules.
This approach makes a lot of sense to me. I think it would be a good
next-step for audit filtering.