Re: New draft standards
On Tuesday, December 08, 2015 02:58:18 PM Paul Moore wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Steve Grubb <sgrubb(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to point out 2 new standards that have been posted to the
> linux audit web page. The first establishes the events around system
> start up and shutdown. This is important because it sets the session
> boundaries for when a system is up or down or crashed.
>
> http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/audit/system-lifecycle.txt
>
> The second standard is more of a forward looking standard. It explains how
> the audit daemon and utilities will perform event enrichment before being
> stored long term in an aggregator. The target for implementation is the
> 2.5 release of the audit daemon.
>
> http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/audit/event-enrichment
>
> Let me know if anyone has feedback on these standards, especially the
> second one.
Were these two specification documents created based on published
standards from an established standards body, e.g. NIST, IETF, etc?
No. All of the standards published to date is documenting what exists and why.
The needs are typically driven by common criteria and the need to detect
certain kinds of events for intrusion detection or anomalous conditions.
If so, I think it would be helpful for you to reference the
published
standard in your documents. If these specifications are an early
draft standard intended to be submitted to a standards body then I
would recommend mentioning the intended group in the document.
No intention of that at this point. The main issue is that we have put a lot
of patches into various utilities. We need other "like" utilities to follow
the same rules. But when you say "follow the same rules", you need some rules
published for them to follow.
The side effect is that third parties can better write analysis programs
without having to reverse engineer what the see in the event stream. They can
go straight to the source and write a program to look for certain things.
-Steve