Re: [RFC][PATCH] (#6 U1) the latest incarnation

On Thursday 24 March 2005 10:28 am, Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 14:22 -0600, Timothy R. Chavez wrote: > > This is the latest patch. > > Other comments: > > - As it stands with your patch, alloc_inode() will leak memory if > audit_inode_alloc() succeeds but security_inode_alloc() fails because > nothing frees the audit data on the error handling path for that case. Is this too bold of a statement: fs/inode.c: inode_alloc if (audit_inode_alloc(inode) && security_inode_alloc(inode)) { .... }