On Friday, January 27, 2023 5:53:24 PM EST Paul Moore wrote:
 On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 5:46 PM Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk>
wrote:
 > On 1/27/23 3:38 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
 > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 2:43 PM Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> wrote:
 > >> On 1/27/23 12:42 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
 > >>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 12:40 PM Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk>
wrote:
 > >>>> On 1/27/23 10:23 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
 > >>>>> A couple of updates to the iouring ops audit bypass selections
 > >>>>> suggested in consultation with Steve Grubb.
 > >>>>> 
 > >>>>> Richard Guy Briggs (2):
 > >>>>>   io_uring,audit: audit IORING_OP_FADVISE but not
IORING_OP_MADVISE
 > >>>>>   io_uring,audit: do not log IORING_OP_*GETXATTR
 > >>>>>  
 > >>>>>  io_uring/opdef.c | 4 +++-
 > >>>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 > >>>> 
 > >>>> Look fine to me - we should probably add stable to both of them,
 > >>>> just to keep things consistent across releases. I can queue them
up
 > >>>> for 6.3.
 > >>> 
 > >>> Please hold off until I've had a chance to look them over ...
 > >> 
 > >> I haven't taken anything yet, for things like this I always let it
 > >> simmer until people have had a chance to do so.
 > > 
 > > Thanks.  FWIW, that sounds very reasonable to me, but I've seen lots
 > > of different behaviors across subsystems and wanted to make sure we
 > > were on the same page.
 > 
 > Sounds fair. BTW, can we stop CC'ing closed lists on patch
 > submissions? Getting these:
 > 
 > Your message to Linux-audit awaits moderator approval
 > 
 > on every reply is really annoying.
 
 We kinda need audit related stuff on the linux-audit list, that's our
 mailing list for audit stuff.
 
 However, I agree that it is crap that the linux-audit list is
 moderated, but unfortunately that isn't something I control (I haven't
 worked for RH in years, and even then the list owner was really weird
 about managing the list).  Occasionally I grumble about moving the
 kernel audit development to a linux-audit list on vger but haven't
 bothered yet, perhaps this is as good a reason as any.
 
 Richard, Steve - any chance of opening the linux-audit list? 
Unfortunately, it really has to be this way. I deleted 10 spam emails 
yesterday. It seems like some people subscribed to this list are compromised. 
Because everytime there is a legit email, it's followed in a few seconds by a 
spam email.
Anyways, all legit email will be approved without needing to be subscribed.
-Steve