Re: [PATCH 11/15] fixing audit rule ordering mess, part 1
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 20:59 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 01:28:08PM -0500, Eric Paris wrote:
> I don't see why prio is only important on AUDIT_FILTER_EXIT. Couldn't I
> end up with stupidity with entry,never ?
AUDIT_WATCH and AUDIT_INODE can live only on exit chain. I.e. we don't have
that problem - other chains sit on the lists of their own and there the
list ordering itself takes care of everything. Exit chain has parts in
sitting in hash instead of the primary list.
Makes perfect sense. They all look good to me.
-Eric