On 15/09/11, Kangkook Jee wrote:
 Hi Richard, 
Hi Kangkook,
 I also did the same experiment for the latest distributions of
Fedora
 core and Debian and here’s the results.
 
 Fedora-22 (64-bit, 4.0.4-301.fc22.x86_64): Problem reproduced.
 Debian-8 (64-bit, 3.16.0-4-amd64): Problem reproduced
 
 Btw, Burn Alting (burn(a)swtf.dyndns.org) suggested me to append audit=1
 to kernel flag. I added the option to boot-loader (grub) and problem
 went away.  
On all systems?  This is expected behaviour.  Sorry I was not more
explicit in asking you to test that.  I guess it was implied by asking
what the settings for the kernel command line were.
Now the surprising bit is that CentOS does not demonstrate the problem
without audit=1 in the command line, which leads me to wonder if they
have set "u32             audit_enabled = 1;" around line 83 of
kernel/audit.c in their kernel source.  It would surprise me if they
did, but it would not be completely unreasonable.
 Regards, Kangkook
 
 > On Sep 11, 2015, at 12:24 PM, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
 > On 15/09/11, Kangkook Jee wrote:
 >> From the previous reply, I think I misunderstood your question regarding kernel
command line. 
 >> Here’s "cat /proc/cmdline” results for distributions that I’ve
experimented. 
 >> 
 >> Ubuntu 14.04 (64-bit): 
 >>    BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-58-generic
root=UUID=7505f862-ce46-49e5-9d1c-e4e307844889 ro text quiet splash vt.handoff=7
 >> 
 >> Ubuntu 12.04 (64-bit): 
 >>    BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-32-generic
root=UUID=5be789be-9b0c-463e-bd18-42bfa79fb24c ro quiet splash
 >> 
 >> CentOS 7 (64-bit): 
 >>    BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 root=/dev/mapper/centos-root ro
rd.lvm.lv=centos/root rd.lvm.lv=centos/swap crashkernel=auto rhgb quiet LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 >> 
 >> CentOS 6 (64-bit): 
 >>    ro root=UUID=a7d44560-adcc-4000-9584-8b9fcf2afd74 rd_NO_LUKS rd_NO_LVM
LANG=en_US.UTF-8 rd_NO_MD SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 crashkernel=129M@0M  KEYBOARDTYPE=pc
KEYTABLE=us rd_NO_DM rhgb quiet
 >> 
 >> I don’t see any audit=<value> entries from all examples above. 
 > 
 > Yes, this is what I was seeking from you.  And you are correct, none of
 > them have audit=1 as I was hoping from at least CentOS.  There is a
 > chance that the CentOS kernel was compiled with audit=1 hardcoded, but I
 > think that is a pretty small chance...
 > 
 > I'll have to look at this closer...  But any Debian and Fedora data
 > points that you can provide would certainly be useful.
 > 
 >> /Kangkook
 >> 
 >>> On Sep 11, 2015, at 5:50 AM, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
 >>> 
 >>> On 15/09/10, Kangkook Jee wrote:
 >>>> Hi all,
 >>>> 
 >>>> I debugged a bit further to identify distributions that are affected by
the issue.
 >>>> I repeated the same experiment with sshd from 3 more distributions.
 >>>> 
 >>>> CentOS Linux release 7.1.1503 (64-bit, 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64): Problem
NOT reproduced
 >>>> CentOS release 6.6 (64-bit, 2.6.32-504.el6.x86_64): Problem NOT
reproduced
 >>>> Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS (64-bit, 3.13.0-32-generic): Problem reproduced
 >>> 
 >>> For each of these examples, what is the value of the kernel command line
 >>> "audit=<value>" if it is even present?  It is possible that
the CentOS
 >>> examples include "audit=1" while Ubuntu omits the line. 
"cat
 >>> /proc/cmdline" should tell you the answer.
 >>> 
 >>>> After all, Ubuntu family are affected by the issue and I could confirm
 >>>> that results are inconsistent across two different distribution
 >>>> families. 
 >>> 
 >>> I would be curious what your results are with a recent Debian and with a
 >>> recent Fedora.
 >>> 
 >>>> If you can let us know how can we workaround the issue, it will be a
great help.
 >>>> 
 >>>> Regards, Kangkook
 >>>> 
 >>>> 
 >>>>> On Sep 9, 2015, at 11:50 PM, Kangkook Jee <aixer77(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
 >>>>> 
 >>>>> Dear all,
 >>>>> 
 >>>>> We are developing custom user space audit agent to gather system
wide system
 >>>>> call trace. While experimenting with various programs, we found out
that
 >>>>> processes (daemons) that started early (along with the system
bootstrapping) do
 >>>>> not report any audit events at all. These processes typically fall
into PID
 >>>>> range of less than 2000. Here’s how I reproduced the symptom with
sshd daemon.
 >>>>> 
 >>>>> 1. Reboot the system
 >>>>> 
 >>>>> 2. Add and enable audit events
 >>>>>  # /sbin/auditctl -a exit,always -F arch=b64 -S clone -S close -S
creat -S dup
 >>>>>         -S dup2 -S dup3 -S execve -S exit -S exit_group -S fork -S
open -S openat 
 >>>>>         -S unlink -S unlinkat -S vfork -S 288 -S accept -S bind -S
connect 
 >>>>>         -S listen -S socket -S socketpair
 >>>>>  # /sbin/auditctl -e1 -b 102400
 >>>>> 
 >>>>> 3. Connect to the system via ssh
 >>>>>   Audit messages generated only from child processes and none are
seen from
 >>>>>   the original daemon.
 >>>>> 
 >>>>> 4. Restart sshd 
 >>>>>   # restart ssh
 >>>>> 
 >>>>> 5. Connect again to the system via ssh
 >>>>>  Now, we see audit messages from both parent and child processes.
 >>>>> 
 >>>>> I did the experiment from Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS distribution (64-bit,
kernel
 >>>>> version 3.13.0-58-generic).
 >>>>> 
 >>>>> I first wonder whether this is intended behavior of audit framework
or
 >>>>> not. If it is intended, I also want to know how can we configure
auditd
 >>>>> differently to capture system calls from all processes. 
 >>>>> 
 >>>>> Thanks a lot for your help in advance!
 >>>>> 
 >>>>> Regards, Kangkook
 >>> 
 >>> - RGB
 > 
 > - RGB 
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs(a)redhat.com>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545