What's the kernel in question? audit hasn't used "inotify" in a long
time. We now use "fsnotify". but in either case, the inodes aren't
supposed to be able to be kicked out of core...
On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 09:04 +0100, Peter Grandi wrote:
[ ... ]
> Thus I have come up with a potential explanation:
> * The 'audit' module does not identify the watched file and
> directory by (device,ino) but by a pointer to an inode table
> entry, a bit like a filesystem module would.
I had a look at the code and it seems it relies on 'inotify' and
the code does get pointers at the relevant in-memory inode
descriptors.
> * During treewalks a lot of inodes get cached in the in-memory
> inode table.
> * This creates pressure on the inode tables and thus the least
> used (in some sense) inodes get evicted, and this includes
> those for the "disappearing directories".
> * When these least used inodes are evicted the 'audit' module
> sees it as if it was a removal of the inode.
To corroborate this I have been running:
while true
do
for D in $(< audit-names.txt)
do (cd "$D" && exec sleep 3001)&
done
sleep 3001
done
Which has the effect of marking the relevant directories as the
active current directories of each 'sleep' process, and none of
those directories were "disappeared" from the 'audit' active
rules list.
The 'inotify' code has a comment that claims:
> * inode: Pinned so long as the inode is associated with a watch, from
> * inotify_add_watch() to the final put_inotify_watch().
They use 'igrab'/'iput', and 'audit_tree.c' and
'audit_watch.c'
uses them, so I wonder what is missing.
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit