Re: [PATCH] new audit rule interface
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 11:10 -0600, Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
Good points Debbie. And just to add fuel to the fire, if we're
concerned about
verbosity and readability, why not just:
audit_transport
I think that unfortunately looses the fact that this is a data structure
representing an "audit rule".
Honestly, if everyone knows and understands that xprt=transport, then
this will work ok. There are certainly more offensive data types and
variable names else in the kernel.
:-Dustin
Attachments:
- signature.asc (application/pgp-signature — 189 bytes)