On 04/16/2014 10:27 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
 Hi Akashi,
 On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 05:39:06AM +0000, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> As done in arm, this change makes it easy to confirm we invoke syscall
> related hooks, including syscall tracepoint, audit and seccomp which would
> be implemented later, in correct order. That is, undoing operations in the
> opposite order on exit that they were done on entry.
>
> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi(a)linaro.org>
 [...]
> +static void tracehook_report_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs,
> +				     enum ptrace_syscall_dir dir)
>   {
> +	int scrach;
 s/scrach/scratch/ 
I will fix it.
 Although, I'd rather have a variable with a more meaningful name.
How about
 regno? 
OK, I will use regno in the next revision, which I will submit soon.
 With that,
    Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon(a)arm.com> 
Thank you so much,
-Takahiro AKASHI
 Cheers,
 Will