Re: [PATCH V9 3/3] audit: add audit by children of executable path
On Friday, August 07, 2015 02:37:15 AM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
On 15/08/06, Paul Moore wrote:
> I guess what I'm saying is that I'm not currently convinced that
> there is enough value in this to offset the risk I feel the loop
> presents. I understand the use cases that you are mentioning, the
> are the same as the last time we discussed this, but I'm going to
> need something better than that.
Can you better describe the loop that concerns you? I don't quite see
it.
It would be the only loop in the patch, look at the for loop in
audit_filter_rules() which iterates up the process' parent chain.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com