On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 10:01 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
 On 2020-07-28 14:47, Paul Moore wrote:
 > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 12:27 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
 > > I know you like only really minimal fixes this late, but this seemed
 > > pretty minimal to me...
 >
 > Minimal is a one (two?) line NULL check in audit_log_name(), this
 > patch is not that.
 I didn't try and test that since I'm not sure that would have worked
 because there appeared to be a low non-NULL value in it.  brauer1's trace had
 0x60 and mine had 0xd0.  Or am I missing something obvious? 
Well, you mentioned the obvious already: both 0x60 and 0xd0 are not
NULL.  We already have a NULL check for context->pwd elsewhere so
there is precedence for this solving a similar problem, although
without going through the git log I'm not sure what problem that
solved, or if it was precautionary.
I agree the low value looks suspicious, it almost looks like an offset
to me, ideally it would be good to understand how/why that value is
"off'.  It could be that the audit_context is not being properly
initialized, reset, or something unrelated is clobbering the value;
all things that would be nice to know.
 The patch provided the information rather than ignoring the problem
... 
I disagree.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com