On 15/11/12, Peter Hurley wrote:
On 11/12/2015 09:15 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 15/11/12, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> On 11/12/2015 02:10 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
>>> On 15/11/10, Peter Hurley wrote:
>>>> The tty termios bits cannot change while n_tty_read() is in the
>>>> i/o loop; the termios_rwsem ensures mutual exclusion with termios
>>>> changes in n_tty_set_termios(). Check L_ICANON() directly and
>>>> eliminate icanon parameter.
>>>>
>>>> NB: tty_audit_add_data() => tty_audit_buf_get() =>
tty_audit_buf_alloc()
>>>> is a single path; ie., tty_audit_buf_get() and tty_audit_buf_alloc()
>>>> have no other callers.
>>>
>>> Which tree is this based on? I don't see where the first chunk
applies.
>>
>> 4.3
>>
>> but this series requires a -stable fix [1] posted earlier but not in any
>> tree yet, which I noted in the cover-letter (was easy to overlook).
>
> Ok, found it. It appears to also depend on "n_tty: Uninline
> tty_copy_to_user()" [2] which I didn't see mentioned and can't find
> upstream.
Sorry, my bad; I overlooked that dependency.
Looks like it also depends on "n_tty: Clarify copy_from_read_buf()" [3].
Any more we should know about? Or should we just wait for GKH's tree?
> Is that in an upstream tree?
Not yet. That will end up in Greg's tty-next tree sometime shortly after
the merge window closes.
>> [1]
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/8/133
>
> [2]
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/8/146
[3]
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/8/145
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs(a)redhat.com>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545