Re: [PATCH v4] selinux: support deferred mapping of contexts
On Wednesday 07 May 2008 13:20:42 Stephen Smalley wrote:
then we'd need to define two new fields, one to correspond
to the real/raw context string corresponding to the scontext and one to
correspond to the real/raw context string corresponding to the tcontext.
And they would only be present if the scontext and/or tcontext happened
to be invalid under current policy. Maybe "rscontext" and
"rtcontext"
if we don't think that will confuse existing userspace
Sounds good to me. I don't think either names you mentioned are taken.
-Steve