Re: [redhat-lspp] Re: [PATCH] change lspp inode auditing
Amy Griffis wrote:
Stephen Smalley wrote: [Thu Mar 30 2006, 08:24:41AM EST]
>On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 14:15 -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
>I assumed that Darrel's patch was feeding into the audit tree. It
>looked sane to me, but I assumed that there would be a final resolution
>on integrating it with Tim's patch and with Amy's work, and a final
>version of the patch would then be posted?
AFAICT the integration of Darrel's patch with my stuff is done.
I agree. I think my patches have been stable for a while and Amy's
stuff sits nicely on top of it (making a few mods to my code for a new
lock). Tim's patch should fit in nicely right on top when rebased
without needing to change any of my stuff. If I'm wrong, let me know
and I'll make the appropriate adjustments. Looks like my patches will
be going into -mm soon (as seen on IRC).
--
Darrel