Re: [PATCH] new audit rule interface
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 15:14 -0500, Amy Griffis wrote:
The more I think about it, I don't really like xprt/transport.
Looking through the kernel sources, the only code that uses xprt
meaning transport is RPC code. I'd prefer to avoid any unwarranted
associations with RPC. I also don't think transport accurately
describes what's happening here.
How about audit_rule_data? I would personally prefer that to
audit_rule_xprt.
I like audit_rule_data better than *_xprt.
Or even audit_rule_ext (for "extended").
:-Dustin
Attachments:
- signature.asc (application/pgp-signature — 189 bytes)