On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 1:14 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 2021-05-10 21:23, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 4:36 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Replace audit syscall class magic numbers with macros.
> >
> > This required putting the macros into new header file
> > include/linux/auditscm.h since the syscall macros were included for both 64
> > bit and 32 bit in any compat code, causing redefinition warnings.
>
> The ifndef/define didn't protect against redeclaration? Huh. Maybe
> I'm not thinking about this correctly, or the arch specific code is
> doing something wonky ...
>
> Regardless, assuming that it is necessary, I would prefer if we called
> it auditsc.h instead of auditscm.h; the latter makes me think of
> sockets and not syscalls.
The "m" was for "macros", since there are auditsc bits in audit.h as
well, but I have no significant objection.
Yes, I figured as much, but my comment about it looking like a socket
"thing" still stands. I'm open to other ideas if you don't like
auditsc.h, I just don't like auditscm.h.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com