On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 15:29 -0500, John Dennis wrote:
Steve Grubb wrote:
> If there's no agreement with them, should we change anything?
> auparse is working pretty good as is.
No it's not. The auparse approach is based on tables, tables which have
been shown to be incorrect and tied to kernel versions and the patch set
used to build that kernel version.
Can you show some example of which kernels had one thing and which
kernels another? Can you also show patch (I assume you mean a RHEL5
patch) sets on top of kernels which changed things so that 2 kernels
would have conflicting output? Hopefully this will help me understand
and address your concerns.
-Eric