On 14/05/05, James Bottomley wrote:
 On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 17:48 -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
 > On 14/05/05, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
 > > Quoting James Bottomley (James.Bottomley(a)HansenPartnership.com):
 > > > On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 14:12 -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
 > > > > Questions:
 > > > > Is there a way to link serial numbers of namespaces involved in
migration of a
 > > > > container to another kernel?  (I had a brief look at CRIU.)  Is there
a unique
 > > > > identifier for each running instance of a kernel?  Or at least some
identifier
 > > > > within the container migration realm?
 > > > 
 > > > Are you asking for a way of distinguishing an migrated container from an
 > > > unmigrated one?  The answer is pretty much "no" because the job
of
 > > > migration is to restore to the same state as much as possible.
 > > > 
 > > > Reading between the lines, I think your goal is to correlate audit
 > > > information across a container migration, right?  Ideally the management
 > > > system should be able to cough up an audit trail for a container
 > > > wherever it's running and however many times it's been migrated?
 > > > 
 > > > In that case, I think your idea of a numeric serial number in a dense
 > > > range is wrong.  Because the range is dense you're obviously never
going
 > > > to be able to use the same serial number across a migration.  However,
 > > 
 > > Ah, but I was being silly before, we can actually address this pretty
 > > simply.  If we just (for instance) add
 > > /proc/self/ns/{ic,mnt,net,pid,user,uts}_seq containing the serial number
 > > for the relevant ns for the task, then criu can dump this info at
 > > checkpoint.  Then at restart it can dump an audit message per task and
 > > ns saying old_serial=%x,new_serial=%x.  That way the audit log reader
 > > can if it cares keep track.
 > 
 > This is the sort of idea I had in mind...
 
 OK, but I don't understand then why you need a serial number.  There are
 plenty of things we preserve across a migration, like namespace name for
 instance.  Could you explain what function it performs because I think I
 might be missing something. 
If a container was defined as an entity with 6 namespaces to itself,
this would make sense.  As Eric P. put it, containers/namespaces seem to
be a bucket of semi-related nuts and bolts, with any namespace being
optional depending on the application.  My understanding is a
container could be migrated to another host requiring the creation of
(none,) some or all of its namespaces, potentially leaving behind some
of its shared namespaces and/or clashing names of namespaces on the
destination host.
 James
 
 > > -serge
 > > 
 > > (Another, more heavyweight approach would be to track all ns hierarchies
 > > and make the serial numbers per-namespace-instance.  So my container's
 > > pidns serial might be 0x2, and if it clones a new pidns that would be
 > > "(0x2,0x1)" on the host, or just 0x1 inside the container.  But we
don't
 > > need that if the simple userspace approach suffices)
 > 
 > This sounds manageable...
 > 
 > - RGB
 > 
 > --
 > Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs(a)redhat.com>
 > Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
 > Remote, Ottawa, Canada
 > Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545
 
 
  
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs(a)redhat.com>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545