Hi Dan!
On Mon 02-07-18 09:05:49, Dan Carpenter wrote:
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jan-Kara/audit-Fix-various-races...
smatch warnings:
kernel/audit_tree.c:484 tag_chunk() warn: inconsistent returns
'mutex:&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex'.
Locked on: line 400
Unlocked on: line 411
#
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/86c9c9a738e409c85891519c17d94043b...
git remote add linux-review
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git remote update linux-review
git checkout 86c9c9a738e409c85891519c17d94043b7f434d5
vim +484 kernel/audit_tree.c
74c3cbe33 Al Viro 2007-07-22 386
74c3cbe33 Al Viro 2007-07-22 387 /* the first tagged inode becomes root of tree
*/
74c3cbe33 Al Viro 2007-07-22 388 static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode,
struct audit_tree *tree)
74c3cbe33 Al Viro 2007-07-22 389 {
e61ce8673 Eric Paris 2009-12-17 390 struct fsnotify_mark *old_entry,
*chunk_entry;
74c3cbe33 Al Viro 2007-07-22 391 struct audit_tree *owner;
74c3cbe33 Al Viro 2007-07-22 392 struct audit_chunk *chunk, *old;
74c3cbe33 Al Viro 2007-07-22 393 struct node *p;
74c3cbe33 Al Viro 2007-07-22 394 int n;
74c3cbe33 Al Viro 2007-07-22 395
86c9c9a73 Jan Kara 2018-06-28 396
mutex_lock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
b1362edfe Jan Kara 2016-12-21 397 old_entry =
fsnotify_find_mark(&inode->i_fsnotify_marks,
b1362edfe Jan Kara 2016-12-21 398 audit_tree_group);
28a3a7eb3 Eric Paris 2009-12-17 399 if (!old_entry)
74c3cbe33 Al Viro 2007-07-22 400 return create_chunk(inode, tree);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Should we drop the lock before this return?
No, because create_chunk() drops &audit_tree_group->mark_mutex in all the
cases. It's a bit ugly to have a function entered with mutex held and
release it but in this case it's somewhat difficult to avoid...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR