Re: user message limits
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 15:14 -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Wednesday 28 January 2009 12:44:27 pm LC Bruzenak wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 12:15 -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
...
> I'm trying to avoid a lot of retry logic on the sending side, where if a
> failure occurs, we would truncate and resend until it passes. I guess if
> I were certain that 7K is always going to fit I could artificially clamp
> my own input there, but it seems better if it were universally constant.
For the time being, you'll need to clamp your input to maybe about 950 chars.
In all the work I've done patching everything, I've never needed to send more
than 200 bytes or so.
That's because maybe you have never worked on a MLS system where all
cross-level cut/paste transfers were required to be audited in toto.
:)
I'll have to put in some retry logic on my end. Probably would
regardless.
LCB.
--
LC (Lenny) Bruzenak
lenny(a)magitekltd.com