Re: [RFC][PATCH] audit: log join and part events to the read-only multicast log socket
On Thursday, October 23, 2014 09:19:49 AM LC Bruzenak wrote:
On 10/22/2014 04:29 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> Well, like I said, It's probably safer that way as the code will work
> regardless. Time to break bad habits :)
I hear you. But there's working and there's working well.
As long as we don't suffer a search response degradation by changing the
assumptive order, as I said, I'm OK with going back and reworking code.
If it makes searching real data unusable, it's now broken some
operational stuff.
Performance is a big deal, I think we've all been hearing that for some time
now. I get it, and it is something that is and will remain *a* priority.
However, this fixed ordering is something that is Just Plain Wrong and is
likely to make life much more difficult for us as we try to improve audit.
--
paul moore
security and virtualization @ redhat