On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 05:12 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
Problem: ordering between the rules on exit chain is currently lost;
all watch and inode rules are listed after everything else _and_
exit,never on one kind doesn't stop exit,always on another from
being matched.
Solution: assign priorities to rules, keep track of the current
highest-priority matching rule and its result (always/never).
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro(a)zeniv.linux.org.uk>
@@ -1258,6 +1258,9 @@ static int audit_add_watch(struct audit_krule
*krule, struct nameidata *ndp,
return ret;
}
+static u64 prio_low = ~0ULL/2;
+static u64 prio_high = ~0ULL/2 - 1;
+
/* Add rule to given filterlist if not a duplicate. */
static inline int audit_add_rule(struct audit_entry *entry,
struct list_head *list)
@@ -1319,6 +1322,14 @@ static inline int audit_add_rule(struct audit_entry *entry,
}
}
+ entry->rule.prio = ~0ULL;
+ if (entry->rule.listnr == AUDIT_FILTER_EXIT) {
+ if (entry->rule.flags & AUDIT_FILTER_PREPEND)
+ entry->rule.prio = ++prio_high;
+ else
+ entry->rule.prio = --prio_low;
+ }
+
if (entry->rule.flags & AUDIT_FILTER_PREPEND) {
list_add_rcu(&entry->list, list);
I don't see why prio is only important on AUDIT_FILTER_EXIT. Couldn't I
end up with stupidity with entry,never ?
-Eric