On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 5:04 AM Jeffrey Vander Stoep <jeffv(a)google.com> wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 3:45 PM Paul Moore
<paul(a)paul-moore.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 9:57 PM James Morris <jmorris(a)namei.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Feb 2021, Paul Moore wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/android/binder.c b/drivers/android/binder.c
> > > index c119736ca56ac..39d501261108d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/android/binder.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/android/binder.c
> > > @@ -2700,7 +2700,7 @@ static void binder_transaction(struct binder_proc
*proc,
> > > u32 secid;
> > > size_t added_size;
> > >
> > > - security_task_getsecid(proc->tsk, &secid);
> > > + security_task_getsecid_subj(proc->tsk, &secid);
> > > ret = security_secid_to_secctx(secid, &secctx,
&secctx_sz);
> > > if (ret) {
> > > return_error = BR_FAILED_REPLY;
> >
> > Can someone from the Android project confirm this is correct for binder?
This looks correct to me.
Thanks for the verification. Should I assume the SELinux specific
binder changes looked okay too?
https://lore.kernel.org/selinux/84053ed8-4778-f246-2177-cf5c1b9516a9@cano...
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com